Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Good job on first blogs!

Let me take a moment to talk about the figures relating to the first blogs...
  • 16 out of 26 students accepted my invitation to this blog site as authors
  • 12 out of 16 students who registered, posted their first blogs
  • But, out of 16 students registered for the blog, only 1 voted for my little poll on the site! [ Boo hoo hoo... :-( ]
If you're one of the 12 mentioned here, give yourself a big applause! Congrats, for showing your first effort!

As for the rest, it would be good if you confront me during consultation hour, so that I can rectify any technical problems you might encounter during the registration. You can also learn from your classmates on how to use the blog site. Take this challenge as a learning curve that would help you in some way in your future.

Overall, here are my comments for the first blogs:
  • Avoid wiki in your references. FYI, wiki content is contributed by many people, including us; thus the reliability is very much doubtful. For real research and article write-up, we still go for jurnals, books and other publications.
  • No need to re-write the questions in your blogs. Don't worry, I can trace them through your answers.
  • Blog title can be of your own creativity; you don't have to follow my 'assignment' title.
  • You are recommended to draft in essay form, combining all the questions in one essay; be creative on the content flow.
  • Definition and characteristics are logically quoted from original source. But examples are best explained from your own understanding. Otherwise, it shows that you don't understand the meaning, and you don't know how to relate to the real world as you see it.
  • It would be the best way to give examples of data, information and knowledge as related to each other - it would show that you understand the difference and relation to each other (on how data related to information, etc.)
  • Reference can be cited from a source that refer the theory from original author. For example: the Davenport's theory is cited or adapted in Pearlson & Saunders (2006). Thus, I can state my reference as "... (as cited in Pearlson & Saunders, 2006)". You can check the format for Harvard and others.
  • Learn from each other. Even though the answers are expected to be the same, but different people refer to different sources, thus giving the answer a wider idea.
Hope my little effort in guiding you through your writing helps you in some way. See you next round!

Ms-Sha
FoMIT, UCSI University

No comments: